Every lease that does not renew costs a community twice. Once in the money spent turning and re-marketing the unit, and again in the revenue that never arrives between move out and move in. Resident retention is the lever that reduces both. It is also one of the few operating metrics a site team can influence every single week. Here is how owners and managers can approach it with traditional methods, technology, and data.
Residents are the lifeblood of any multifamily community. Without them, a community would be nothing more than an empty shell. That is why it matters to understand the best data-driven strategies for keeping them.
Resident retention is defined broadly as the ability of a community to keep existing residents from moving out. More specifically, it is the percentage of expiring leases that are renewed, meaning the resident has been retained and is not moving out of the property.
Say ten (10) leases are reaching their contractual end date — that is, expiring — in a particular month. If five (5) of the leases renew, the property is deemed to have a 50% resident retention ratio for that month.
The definition looks simple, and that is exactly where portfolios get into trouble. Does a month-to-month holdover count as a renewal? Does a transfer to another unit in the same community count? Is the denominator leases expiring or residents at the start of the period? All of those are choices, and different property management systems make them differently. Two communities can both report strong resident retention and mean different things by it.
Traditional methods of retaining residents have long proven to be effective when executed well. None of them are new, and all of them are still the base of any resident retention program.
Creating a welcome and enjoyable community environment lends to residents wanting to stay longer at a rental property. Operators can support a positive resident experience by offering amenities like well-maintained outdoor spaces, family-friendly events, or free parking.
Location is a huge factor for retaining residents. Properties located in walkable neighborhoods, near shopping, schools and public transit, and with low crime rates hold residents more easily. Location is fixed at acquisition, but how prominently it features in renewal conversations is not.
Offering incentives and rewards such as discounts or gift cards shows residents that their presence is valued, and can encourage them to stay. The point is recognition as much as economics.
Improving communications by sending regular newsletters and emails, and conducting face-to-face meetings, helps build relationships with trust and a sense of community. A renewal offer is far easier to accept from a team the resident already knows.
Technology innovations can also be leveraged to maximize resident retention, mostly by removing effort from the resident's side of the transaction.
Maximizing resident retention benefits owners and managers by reducing vacancies and turnover costs. It also benefits residents, by creating a sense of community, increasing satisfaction, and fostering a positive living experience. Those two outcomes are not in tension. That is what makes retention an unusually easy priority to align a site team around, and a natural place to start when reviewing property management operations across a portfolio.
Not automatically, and the comparison is worth running rather than assuming. When market rates rise, it may be challenging for the manager to offer the current resident a lease renewal at a price point that makes sense for the community. When supply is low and rents are increasing in the market, it may be more beneficial to attract a new resident than to renew at a slightly higher renewal rate.
Before making a decision, the team that makes pricing decisions should compare the overall cost of gaining a new resident at market rents versus renewing an existing resident. To turn a unit, there are the costs of repairing damages and refreshing the unit, the cost of marketing the unit, and the absence of revenue for the period from move out to move in.
Put those together and the renewal rate that looks like a discount often is not. In some instances, even with higher market rents, it may be more cost-effective to keep a current resident and avoid the costs associated with vacancy, turnover, and marketing. The answer varies by unit type, by season, and by how long units of that type are currently sitting on the market. That is why renewal pricing should be calculated rather than assumed.
While resident retention at some level is crucial for the success of a multifamily community, there are instances where a manager may not want a particular resident to renew. Three come up regularly.
A lack of supply with increasing rates in the market can make a renewal the weaker of two options. That holds once the full comparison above has been run and the numbers genuinely favor re-leasing.
The property may not want a resident to renew if there are needed renovations or upgrades that will cause disruptions to the resident's living experience. It may be more beneficial for the community to let the resident move out, then renovate the unit to attract a new resident at a higher price point.
If a resident is causing significant problems within the community, such as consistently breaking the rules or disturbing other residents, the staff may not want to renew that lease. Addressing these issues proactively is important. Still, there may be instances where it is in the best interest of the community as a whole to let the resident go at the end of the lease term.
Resident retention strategies are only as good as the feedback loop behind them. A community that reviews renewals once a quarter learns too late. A portfolio that reviews them without consistent definitions learns the wrong thing.
Pulling those together across communities is where most portfolios stall, because the underlying lease and turnover records live in separate property management systems. The Turnover Tracker in Data Plus exists for exactly that: standardized turnover and renewal data across the portfolio, so the same question gets the same answer at every property. From there, standardized portfolio reporting lets regional teams compare communities rather than reconciling spreadsheets.
Multifamily communities must focus on a plan to engage with residents and promote retention if they want to succeed. By utilizing traditional and technology-driven strategies, owners and managers can create a positive resident experience, offer incentives and rewards, improve communication, and leverage online platforms and social media. Investing in the right strategies will benefit the community, the residents, and the staff alike.
Improving resident retention starts with the fundamentals: a welcoming community environment, well-maintained amenities, incentives that show residents they are valued, and regular communication through newsletters, emails, and face-to-face contact. Then reduce friction with technology, using online platforms to make renewing easy and automation to send reminders as leases approach expiration. Measure renewal conversion and move out reasons consistently so you can tell which efforts are working.
Some causes sit outside the community's control, and some do not. Community environment, amenity condition, responsiveness of staff, and the quality of communication are all within the operator's influence. Location factors such as walkability, proximity to shopping, schools and transit, and neighborhood safety shape the decision as well. Sorting move out reasons into controllable and uncontrollable buckets is the fastest way to find out which category your losses fall into.
It varies by property and unit type, but the components are consistent: repairing damages and refreshing the unit, marketing the unit, and the lost revenue for the entire period from move out to move in. Calculate those three together for your own communities rather than relying on a rule of thumb. Once you have the number, you can compare it directly against the gap between a renewal rate and a market rate. That is the only way to know whether replacing a resident actually pays.
Retention, turn cost, and vacant days only line up in one place when the data behind them has been standardized across every property and system.
See plans and pricing