Policy Analysis · Multifamily Regulation

Renters Bill of Rights: what the White House blueprint means for multifamily

The White House’s White Paper on the Renters Bill of Rights has generated a lot of conversation across the multifamily and rental housing industry. It lays out actions and initiatives meant to increase fairness in the rental market and further the principles of fair housing. What it does not do, at least yet, is spell out new requirements for operators. This analysis covers what the blueprint says, how the industry has responded, and how to prepare while the immediate impacts stay unclear.

DEFINITION

What is the Renters Bill of Rights?

The Renters Bill of Rights is a White Paper the White House released in January 2023 to protect renters and promote rental affordability. It describes a set of actions and initiatives from the Biden-Harris Administration. Its stated aims are to increase fairness in the rental market and to further the principles of fair housing.

The word “actions” deserves attention. The paper does not provide specifics about what new requirements, if any, will be expected of the multifamily industry right away. A white paper of this kind sets direction for federal agencies. It does not, on its own, change the rules an operator must follow.

Why a White House rent policy paper is not yet a rule

Binding requirements reach operators through a different path. An agency proposes a rule, takes public comment, and issues a final version with an effective date. The blueprint points several agencies down that path. Until they act, the industry will need to look out for new regulations to learn what the White Paper’s potential impacts actually are.

The blueprint is a statement of intent, not a compliance deadline. Watch the agencies it names, because that is where any real requirements will come from.
THE FOUR AREAS

Which rent policy areas does the blueprint cover?

The paper groups its actions into four areas that touch day-to-day multifamily operations. Each names a federal agency and a direction of travel. None yet names a specific obligation.

01

Data collection on renters and applicants

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) will collect information to identify practices that unfairly prevent applicants and tenants from accessing or staying in housing. Multifamily operators will need to be prepared to provide data and information to these agencies as part of that process.

02

Limits on egregious rent increases

The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) announced that it will launch a new public process to examine proposed actions promoting renter protections and limits on egregious rent increases for future investments. Operators will need to watch for any new regulations or guidelines on rent increases and adjust their pricing accordingly.

03

Credit reporting and positive rent payment programs

The CFPB will coordinate with the FTC to promote enforcement of accurate reporting by credit reporting systems and to hold background check companies accountable for unreasonable procedures. The paper also encourages resident credit programming, such as helping tenants build and improve credit by reporting positive rent payments to credit bureaus.

04

Eviction prevention, diversion and relief

The White Paper emphasizes the importance of eviction prevention, diversion, and relief. Operators will need to be aware of any new regulations or guidelines on evictions and make sure that they are followed.

Taken together, multifamily operators may expect to see changes to fair housing laws, data collection and analysis, rent increases, and eviction prevention and relief. The order in which those changes arrive, and the form they take, is what remains open.

INDUSTRY RESPONSE

How has the multifamily industry responded to the Renters Bill of Rights?

The three largest industry associations responded quickly, and their positions line up. Each supports resident-focused practices in principle. Each objects to expanded federal involvement in a relationship they see as governed by state and local law.

NMHC: rent rules are already handled at the state and local level

The National Multifamily Housing Council (NMHC) expressed concern that the new actions announced by the Biden-Harris Administration could “lead to duplicative and onerous regulations that are already being addressed at the state and local level.” The council also argued that these efforts will not “address the nation’s housing shortage and could discourage much-needed investments in housing.”

NAA: carrots over sticks for renters and landlords

The National Apartment Association (NAA) emphasized its commitment to promoting industry resident services and practices. It also made clear “the industry’s opposition to expanded federal involvement in the landlord-tenant relationship.” The NAA believes that “complex housing policy is a state and local issue and that the best solutions utilize carrots over sticks.”

NAHB: build more homes for renters, not more rules

The National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) expressed disagreement with the new protections for renters. Chairman Jerry Konter believes the federal government should ‘focus on strengthening existing programs like the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit’ to increase the supply of affordable housing. In his words, “if the Administration is truly committed to helping America’s renters, it will champion solutions that will enable builders to construct more apartments and homes to reduce the nation’s deficit of 1.5 million housing units.”

The common thread is supply. The associations frame affordability as a shortage problem and read the blueprint as a demand-side response. The question of who should set the rules for rental housing is not new; our look at who governs the digital landlord traces the same tension from the technology side.

PREPARATION

How should operators prepare for the Renters Bill of Rights?

The blueprint has no compliance date, but every area it names implies preparation work. The practical response is to be ready to answer questions before an agency asks them. Five moves cover the ground.

  • Inventory the data you could be asked for. The FTC and CFPB data collection effort means operators should know where application, screening, and tenancy records live and how quickly they can be produced. Consolidated property management reporting turns that response into a query rather than a project.
  • Review how rent increases are set. FHFA’s public process targets egregious rent increases on future investments. Documenting how renewal pricing is decided today makes it easier to adjust if guidelines arrive.
  • Audit screening and credit reporting vendors. Accurate reporting and reasonable background check procedures are the stated enforcement focus. Positive rent payment reporting is the stated encouragement.
  • Document eviction prevention and diversion steps. Written procedures for payment plans, referrals, and diversion programs are easier to defend and easier to update.
  • Prepare to communicate. Operators will need to communicate any changes to tenants and other stakeholders. A plain-language summary drafted now saves a scramble later.

All of this is easier when records are consistent across properties. Data readiness also raises questions about handling resident information responsibly, and our privacy and data policies describe how that information is handled on our side.

Why resident-centered practices matter under any rent policy

The White Paper’s themes are fair access, predictable rent increases, credit building, and eviction prevention. Many operators already run practices in each of those areas. Incorporating resident-centered property management practices into the business now means fewer changes later, whatever the final rules say. Our guide to resident retention strategies covers the operational side of that work.

OUTLOOK

Is the blueprint a significant development for renters and operators?

It may be, but as of January 2023 it is too soon to tell. The release of the White Paper could prove a significant development for the multifamily industry, or it could stall at the agency level. The honest answer is that the immediate impacts are unclear.

What operators can control is readiness. They will need to be aware of the immediate impacts and any new regulatory requirements that follow the White Paper. They will need to consider how resident-centered practices fit their business. And they will need to be prepared to communicate changes to tenants and other stakeholders.

The rent affordability blueprint is a signal of direction. The regulations, if they come, are the thing to plan for.
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

01
What is the Renters Bill of Rights?

The Renters Bill of Rights is a White House White Paper, released in January 2023, that lays out actions and initiatives to increase fairness in the rental market and further the principles of fair housing. It covers data collection by the FTC and CFPB, a FHFA process on rent increases, credit reporting practices, and eviction prevention. It does not itself impose new requirements on multifamily operators.

02
How does the rent affordability blueprint affect landlords?

As of January 2023, the blueprint creates no new obligations for landlords, because it does not specify what new requirements will be expected of the industry right away. It does signal where federal agencies plan to look: rental application and tenancy practices, egregious rent increases, credit and background check reporting, and evictions. Landlords should watch for the regulations that follow and prepare to provide data if asked.

03
Does the Renters Bill of Rights impose federal rent control?

No. The paper announces that the FHFA will launch a public process to examine proposed actions promoting renter protections and limits on egregious rent increases for future investments. That is an examination, not a rule, and it applies to future investments rather than existing loans. Any actual limit would have to come through a later regulation.

04
How did the multifamily industry respond?

NMHC warned of “duplicative and onerous regulations” already addressed at the state and local level and said the actions could discourage investment in housing. NAA restated its opposition to expanded federal involvement in the landlord-tenant relationship and called for carrots over sticks. NAHB argued the federal government should strengthen programs like the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit to address a deficit of 1.5 million housing units.

Be ready to answer before the agencies ask

Consistent, consolidated property data turns a regulatory request into a query rather than a project, and makes resident-centered reporting routine across every property.

See plans and pricing